Showing posts with label Linda Warren. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Linda Warren. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Review: Juan Angel Chávez @ Linda Warren

More often than not, Juan Angel Chávez works with plywood.

Along with an understanding of solid wood's hygroscopic character and corresponding dimensional instability, the (traditional) woodworker's foremost concern--fiber orientation--has disappeared from the art offered by Chávez.

The pieces on display at Linda Warren Gallery are not born of any refined craft; they're as raw as they are fragile.  And by virtue of the means and material of their fabrication they're almost wholly disconnected from the history of woodwork prior to WWII.  Whether in the final analysis determined to be helpful or harmful to the artwork, such things ought to be considered as noteworthy in every preliminary estimation.

Juan Angel Chávez @ Linda Warren

Plywood is an engineered material; it's designed to "overcome" the natural behavior of its chief component.  Plywood consists of veneer (ply) stacked upon veneer; each layer's fibers are set perpendicular to the fibers of the layer immediately preceding; the whole affair is held together (laminated) with synthetic resin.  Only recent developments in "glue" technology have made plywood an affordable, stable and popular choice across a broad spectrum of applications.

Looking closely, Chávez tends to produce wood-colored and wood-textured objects which are not made of "real" wood; rather, they are simulacra thereof. Chávez creates sometimes fanciful and sometimes ominous structures which are surreal and abstract. In many cases, without question, the incorporation of found objects predetermines the scale and proportion of the finished piece.

Juan Angel Chávez @ Linda Warren

Chávez  is a builder, not a carver.  "Wood," i.e., lumber, is produced by cutting trees; it's formed through a subtractive process. "Plywood" is built from lumber; it's the end result of an additive process. Tree trunks are irregular, three-dimensional (roughly conical) shapes; plywood is uniform, and nearly two-dimensional. As a practical matter, the use of plywood and not wood might be thought to make the task of fabrication easier and faster for Chávez .

Essentially, in his most recognizable idiom, Chávez "draws" geometric and quasi-organic figures with the aid of "contour lines" cut from plywood.  Fabric stretched across said plywood framing conveys a potential volume; the mechanical fasteners used therein hold not canvas or linen but rather (often) Lycra panels. Like plywood, Lycra is a relatively modern innovation--in this case an innovation producing cloth with a flexibility greater than natural fibers would otherwise impart.

Juan Angel Chávez @ Linda Warren

Chávez isn't (manifestly) interested in Nature, or in natural limitations. Rather, his work--sculpture, collage, installation, whatever form it takes--tends to incorporate and resemble things made by the imagination of Man. In a formal sense, the strongest of the pieces (shown by Chávez over time in Chicago) draw near to Richard Deacon. Chávez is distinctive in his ability to work along a vertical axis. At his best, Chávez is playful and his artworks rise lightly: like a child's bubbling laughter.

Whether the recreation of American urban decay, a tendency also found across the body of work attributable to Chávez, should in time prove more prescient is unpleasant to consider.

Juan Angel Chavez @ Linda Warren
Above: Juan Angel Chávez @ Linda Warren, December 11, 2009 - January 16, 2010

Juan Angel Chávez @ Hyde Park Art Center
Above: Juan Angel Chávez @ Hyde Park Art Center, November 8, 2009 - January 24, 2010

Juan Angel Chávez
April 15 – May 14, 2011
Linda Warren Gallery: Project Space
1052 W Fulton Market
Chicago, IL 60607
http://www.lindawarrengallery.com

- Paul Germanos

Monday, March 21, 2011

Pictorial: Conrad Freiburg @ Hyde Park Art Center

Twelve images and text (produced at two separate expositions) which in combination help to document Conrad Freiburg's October, 2010 - June, 2011 residency in Studio 6 on the second floor at the Hyde Park Art Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Conrad Freiburg @ Hyde Park Art Center
Freiburg atop his "harmonograph" at center of opening.

Conrad Freiburg @ Hyde Park Art Center
Freiburg monitoring harmonograph output.

Conrad Freiburg @ Hyde Park Art Center

Conrad Freiburg @ Hyde Park Art Center

Above:
Conrad Freiburg in,
It Is What It Isn't
March 20 - June 26, 2011
Hyde Park Art Center, Gallery 1
5020 S. Cornell Avenue
Chicago, IL 60615
http://www.hydeparkart.org

Below:
Conrad Freiburg with,
Self Contained Unit of Entropy
May 13, 2011
Hyde Park Art Center, Gallery 1
5020 S. Cornell Avenue
Chicago, IL 60615
http://www.hydeparkart.org

Conrad Freiburg & SCUE @ Hyde Park Art Center
Conrad Freiburg.

Conrad Freiburg & SCUE @ Hyde Park Art Center
Self Contained Unit of Entropy, SCUE, in operation.

Conrad Freiburg & SCUE @ Hyde Park Art Center
Chuck Thurow displays piece which survived SCUE.

Conrad Freiburg & SCUE @ Hyde Park Art Center
Typical SCUE output.

Conrad Freiburg & SCUE @ Hyde Park Art Center
Typical harmonograph output.

Conrad Freiburg & SCUE @ Hyde Park Art Center

Conrad Freiburg & SCUE @ Hyde Park Art Center

Conrad Freiburg & SCUE @ Hyde Park Art Center

Conrad Freiburg is represented in Chicago by Linda Warren:
http://www.lindawarrengallery.com

See also: Bert Stabler's review in Newcity Art,
http://art.newcity.com/2011/04/25/review-conrad-freiburghyde-park-art-center/

See also: Conrad Freiburg in his own words, offering the last entry at the Studio Chicago blog,
http://studiochicago.blogspot.com/2010/10/great-american-loserdom.html

- Paul Germanos

Friday, August 20, 2010

Review: Lora Fosberg @ Linda Warren Gallery

In September 2009, at the opening of Chicago's current exhibition season, the presentation of Robyn O'Neil at Tony Wight Gallery and Davis/Langlois at Monique Meloche Gallery suggested a renewed interest in manual competence as evidenced in a traditional process, viz. drawing.  And, whether their subjects tended to be landscape (O'Neil) or portrait (Davis/Langlois) it's noteworthy that said artists offered their renderings as informed by some personally-constructed mythology: O'Neil's scenes were actually surreal; Davis/Langlois provided a fictional setting in which they cast real characters.

The (re)appearance of such craft might have been regarded as auspicious, or ominous, but it proved to be neither: indicating no trend in the near-term.  The careful hand of the artist--upon papers of like scale and number--did not return till 10 months had passed.

Carol Jackson at Swimming Pool Project Space, as well as Tony Fitzpatrick and Scott Nadeau at Studio 1020, among others, did present "well-drawn" two-dimensional objects of art.  But, compared to O'Neil and Davis/Langlois, they did so on a smaller scale, or with a smaller number of pieces, or outside of a conceptual framework of their own creation.

Maybe more closely related to the subject of this review was Jason Middlebrook's May 2010 solo show at Monique Meloche Gallery in which he (Middlebrook) reinforced a thematic concern for the management and allocation of natural resources by means of connecting large-scale, representational drawings to a site-specific installation.  But Middlebrook's drawing was only ancillary to his three-dimensional work.

That much (above) has been written NOT for the purpose of dismissing the aforementioned artists or spaces--but rather as a remembrance and acknowledgment of them.  Too, it seems good to provide context.  In this year, Lora Fosberg should be connected to: Robyn O'Neil, Robert Davis and Michael Langlois, Carol Jackson, Tony Fitzpatrick, and Jason Middlebrook at least.

+ + +

Within Lora Fosberg's graphic narratives the elements of text and image were expected to diverge: one having grown at the expense of the other.

Lora Fosberg @ Linda Warren

Whether beginning with Zoroaster, the simple dichotomy is a pattern too familiar in the history of the West.  So that even late in so-called Modernity (Friedrich Nietzsche to Camille Paglia at least) it's been possible for cultural observers to borrow from Greek antiquity the motifs of the Apollonian and Dionysian: identifying two contemporary tendencies in opposition to one another, usually as part of an analysis by contrast.

For a critic to want to "read" a visual artist as pointing, compass-like, in a particular direction, seems natural--as any theorist's claim to prowess stems from an ability to offer the insight or framework which allows experience to be structured in such a way that meaning is the result.

In Fosberg's case, acknowledging both the duality which does exist and also the temptation to draw out incongruities, what's actually happened across her oeuvre is something else altogether: she has, surprisingly, managed to sustain the (relatively) equal development of two distinct avenues of expression.

Whether united in a single composition, both (her text and image) have continued to recall one another as a result of a common palette and her hand drawn line.  There's no gloss.  There's little vivid color.  Everything looks as though it was produced by the same person, with care, over time--maybe even some time ago.

Having written that, the successful synthesis which culminates in Fosberg's exhibition, "You Can’t Fall Off The Floor," isn't explained by the warm tone or matte patina seeming to cover the art.

Fosberg does well because her practice has evolved to treat words and pictures as modular, graphic units--rather than as parts of a fixed composition.  As goes the pithy quote painted on paper, so goes the tree trunk print.  Here, it's important to pay attention to method.

Lora Fosberg @ Linda Warren

Two years ago the size of a finished piece was determined aforehand by the size of the paper upon which she began to work.  Then, while continuing to draw on the same (small) scale, her pieces grew in size as multiple papers (serving to ground individual drawings) were collaged upon panels.  Now, those panels are found set beside each other.  Or, those panels are discarded altogether--and paper is collaged directly upon wall surfaces.

Fosberg has become heavily engaged in the acts of building and layering, albeit working closely to the vertical surface of the wall.  She's flirting with low relief sculpture and (fiber art) textiles, and is no longer bound by the page.  Pieces run on as long as she pleases.  As a result, much of her work is now infinitely scalable.

That feminine aspect of the Dionysian which was manifest in the maenads--chaotic, sexual, immoderate, even violent beings--is visible upon close inspection of some of Fosberg's pieces.  And that's where she seems to be at her strongest: glancing, oblique, abstract, her subtext quietly revealing an enigmatic challenge contrary to Man's effort to understand, to control, Nature.

Lora Fosberg @ Linda Warren

Lora Fosberg
"You Can’t Fall Off The Floor"
June 25 - August 21, 2010
Tues–Sat, 11-5 PM
Linda Warren Gallery
1052 West Fulton Market
Chicago, IL 60607-1207
http://www.lindawarrengallery.com

Lora Fosberg,
http://lorafosberg.com

- Paul Germanos